diff --git a/patches.suse/objtool-Check-that-module-init-exit-function-is-an-i.patch b/patches.suse/objtool-Check-that-module-init-exit-function-is-an-i.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c6fc55c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/patches.suse/objtool-Check-that-module-init-exit-function-is-an-i.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
+Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:52:15 +0100
+Subject: objtool: Check that module init/exit function is an indirect call target
+Patch-mainline: Queued in subsystem maintainer repository
+Git-repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
+Git-commit: 03d7a1053cf72372be22b43faada5bca12ff183d
+References: none
+
+Some out-of-tree modules still do not use module_init() / module_exit()
+macros and simply create functions with magic names init_module() and
+cleanup_module() instead. As a result, these functions are not recognized
+as indirect call targets by objtool and such module fails to load into an
+IBT enabled kernel.
+
+This old way is not even documented any more but it is cleaner to issue
+a warning than to let the module fail on load without obvious reason.
+
+Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
+Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
+Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230118105215.B9DA960514@lion.mk-sys.cz
+---
+ tools/objtool/Documentation/objtool.txt | 8 ++++++++
+ tools/objtool/check.c                   | 7 +++++++
+ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/tools/objtool/Documentation/objtool.txt
++++ b/tools/objtool/Documentation/objtool.txt
+@@ -410,6 +410,14 @@ the objtool maintainers.
+    can remove this warning by putting the ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL
+    directive right before the call.
+ 
++12. file.o: warning: func(): not an indirect call target
++
++   This means that objtool is running with --ibt and a function expected
++   to be an indirect call target is not. In particular, this happens for
++   init_module() or cleanup_module() if a module relies on these special
++   names and does not use module_init() / module_exit() macros to create
++   them.
++
+ 
+ If the error doesn't seem to make sense, it could be a bug in objtool.
+ Feel free to ask the objtool maintainer for help.
+--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
++++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
+@@ -847,8 +847,15 @@ static int create_ibt_endbr_seal_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
+ 	list_for_each_entry(insn, &file->endbr_list, call_node) {
+ 
+ 		int *site = (int *)sec->data->d_buf + idx;
++		struct symbol *sym = insn->sym;
+ 		*site = 0;
+ 
++		if (opts.module && sym && sym->type == STT_FUNC &&
++		    insn->offset == sym->offset &&
++		    (!strcmp(sym->name, "init_module") ||
++		     !strcmp(sym->name, "cleanup_module")))
++			WARN("%s(): not an indirect call target", sym->name);
++
+ 		if (elf_add_reloc_to_insn(file->elf, sec,
+ 					  idx * sizeof(int),
+ 					  R_X86_64_PC32,
diff --git a/series.conf b/series.conf
index 1aee22b..d355211 100644
--- a/series.conf
+++ b/series.conf
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@
 	# sorted patches
 	########################################################
 
+	# tip/tip
+	patches.suse/objtool-Check-that-module-init-exit-function-is-an-i.patch
 	########################################################
 	# end of sorted patches
 	########################################################