From: Chris Wilson Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:12:27 +0000 Subject: drm/i915/execlists: Reduce list_for_each_safe+list_safe_reset_next MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Git-commit: 2221c5b7ddfae1ed1ca8b21a9092d0878281293a Patch-mainline: v4.17-rc1 References: FATE#326289 FATE#326079 FATE#326049 FATE#322398 FATE#326166 After staring at the list_for_each_safe macros for a bit, our current invocation of list_safe_reset_next in execlists_schedule() simply reduces to list_for_each. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180102151235.3949-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Acked-by: Petr Tesarik --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c @@ -1037,7 +1037,7 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct dr * end result is a topological list of requests in reverse order, the * last element in the list is the request we must execute first. */ - list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, p, &dfs, dfs_link) { + list_for_each_entry(dep, &dfs, dfs_link) { struct i915_priotree *pt = dep->signaler; /* @@ -1056,8 +1056,6 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct dr if (prio > READ_ONCE(p->signaler->priority)) list_move_tail(&p->dfs_link, &dfs); } - - list_safe_reset_next(dep, p, dfs_link); } /*