From e81b3a555f27cae5381ab148df3fa543e1b93ea2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Bragg Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 16:43:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/perf: fix gen7_append_oa_reports comment Git-commit: e81b3a555f27cae5381ab148df3fa543e1b93ea2 Patch-mainline: v4.13-rc1 References: FATE#322643 bsc#1055900 If I'm going to complain about a back-to-front convention then the least I can do is not muddle the comment up too. Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170511154345.962-2-lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Acked-by: Takashi Iwai --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_ * userspace. * * Note: reports are consumed from the head, and appended to the - * tail, so the head chases the tail?... If you think that's mad + * tail, so the tail chases the head?... If you think that's mad * and back-to-front you're not alone, but this follows the * Gen PRM naming convention. *