Blob Blame History Raw
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:00:30 +0100
Subject: bpf: Fix spelling mistake "arithmatic" -> "arithmetic" in
 test_verifier
Patch-mainline: v5.7-rc2
Git-commit: 250e778fe1635b237d9f52c5d9df202cf23413d6
References: bsc#1177028

There are a couple of spelling mistakes in two literal strings, fix them.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200331100030.41372-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Acked-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@
 	.result = REJECT
 },
 {
-	"bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmatic. test1",
+	"bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmetic. test1",
 	.insns = {
 	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
 	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@
 	.result = ACCEPT
 },
 {
-	"bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmatic. test2",
+	"bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmetic. test2",
 	.insns = {
 	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
 	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),