From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:52:31 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] blk-iocost: ioc_pd_free() shouldn't assume irq disabled
Git-commit: 5aeac7c4b16069aae49005f0a8d4526baa83341b
Patch-mainline: v5.9-rc4
References: git-fixes

ioc_pd_free() grabs irq-safe ioc->lock without ensuring that irq is disabled
when it can be called with irq disabled or enabled. This has a small chance
of causing A-A deadlocks and triggers lockdep splats. Use irqsave operations
instead.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: 7caa47151ab2 ("blkcg: implement blk-iocost")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
---
 block/blk-iocost.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index 413e0b5c8e6b..d37b55db2409 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -2092,14 +2092,15 @@ static void ioc_pd_free(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
 {
 	struct ioc_gq *iocg = pd_to_iocg(pd);
 	struct ioc *ioc = iocg->ioc;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (ioc) {
-		spin_lock(&ioc->lock);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&ioc->lock, flags);
 		if (!list_empty(&iocg->active_list)) {
 			propagate_active_weight(iocg, 0, 0);
 			list_del_init(&iocg->active_list);
 		}
-		spin_unlock(&ioc->lock);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->lock, flags);
 
 		hrtimer_cancel(&iocg->waitq_timer);
 		hrtimer_cancel(&iocg->delay_timer);
-- 
2.29.2