Blob Blame History Raw
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:19:21 +0100
Subject: blk-mq: Remove 'running from the wrong CPU' warning
Patch-mainline: v5.11-rc1
Git-commit: e6582cb5dab4ae572513412cc10fd0ffe07e0b05
References: bsc#1174486

It's guaranteed that no request is in flight when a hctx is going
offline. This warning is only triggered when the wq's CPU is hot
plugged and the blk-mq is not synced up yet.

As this state is temporary and the request is still processed
correctly, better remove the warning as this is the fast path.

Suggested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 block/blk-mq.c |   25 -------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)

--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1387,31 +1387,6 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct
 	int srcu_idx;
 
 	/*
-	 * We should be running this queue from one of the CPUs that
-	 * are mapped to it.
-	 *
-	 * There are at least two related races now between setting
-	 * hctx->next_cpu from blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu() and running
-	 * __blk_mq_run_hw_queue():
-	 *
-	 * - hctx->next_cpu is found offline in blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(),
-	 *   but later it becomes online, then this warning is harmless
-	 *   at all
-	 *
-	 * - hctx->next_cpu is found online in blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(),
-	 *   but later it becomes offline, then the warning can't be
-	 *   triggered, and we depend on blk-mq timeout handler to
-	 *   handle dispatched requests to this hctx
-	 */
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) &&
-		cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)) {
-		printk(KERN_WARNING "run queue from wrong CPU %d, hctx %s\n",
-			raw_smp_processor_id(),
-			cpumask_empty(hctx->cpumask) ? "inactive": "active");
-		dump_stack();
-	}
-
-	/*
 	 * We can't run the queue inline with ints disabled. Ensure that
 	 * we catch bad users of this early.
 	 */