Blob Blame History Raw
From 7f57b295f990c0fa07f96d51ca1c82c52dbf79cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 17:44:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: zynq: fix reference leak in zynq_gpio functions
Git-commit: 7f57b295f990c0fa07f96d51ca1c82c52dbf79cc
Patch-mainline: v5.10
References: git-fixes

pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it
failed. Forgetting to putting operation will result in a
reference leak here.

A new function pm_runtime_resume_and_get is introduced in
[0] to keep usage counter balanced. So We fix the reference
leak by replacing it with new funtion.

[0] dd8088d5a896 ("PM: runtime: Add  pm_runtime_resume_and_get to deal with usage counter")

Fixes: c2df3de0d07e ("gpio: zynq: properly support runtime PM for GPIO used as interrupts")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
index 0b5a17ab996f..3521c1dc3ac0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
@@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ static int zynq_gpio_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)
 	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->parent);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(chip->parent);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ static int zynq_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
 	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_pm_dis;
 
-- 
2.26.2