From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 21:03:53 +0200
Subject: KVM: s390: Fix PV check in deliverable_irqs()
Git-commit: d47c4c454ab023feae8c5be56bb14927d064bac0
Patch-mainline: v5.7-rc3
References: git-fixes
The diag 0x44 handler, which handles a directed yield, goes into a
a codepath that does a kvm_for_each_vcpu() and ultimately
deliverable_irqs(). The new check for kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected()
contains an assertion that the vcpu->mutex is held, which isn't going
to be the case in this scenario.
The result is a plethora of these messages if the lock debugging
is enabled, and thus an implication that we have a problem.
WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 16167 at arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h:239 deliverable_irqs+0x1c6/0x1d0 [kvm]
...snip...
Call Trace:
[<000003ff80429bf2>] deliverable_irqs+0x1ca/0x1d0 [kvm]
([<000003ff80429b34>] deliverable_irqs+0x10c/0x1d0 [kvm])
[<000003ff8042ba82>] kvm_s390_vcpu_has_irq+0x2a/0xa8 [kvm]
[<000003ff804101e2>] kvm_arch_dy_runnable+0x22/0x38 [kvm]
[<000003ff80410284>] kvm_vcpu_on_spin+0x8c/0x1d0 [kvm]
[<000003ff80436888>] kvm_s390_handle_diag+0x3b0/0x768 [kvm]
[<000003ff80425af4>] kvm_handle_sie_intercept+0x1cc/0xcd0 [kvm]
[<000003ff80422bb0>] __vcpu_run+0x7b8/0xfd0 [kvm]
[<000003ff80423de6>] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xee/0x3e0 [kvm]
[<000003ff8040ccd8>] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2c8/0x8d0 [kvm]
[<00000001504ced06>] ksys_ioctl+0xae/0xe8
[<00000001504cedaa>] __s390x_sys_ioctl+0x2a/0x38
[<0000000150cb9034>] system_call+0xd8/0x2d8
2 locks held by CPU 2/KVM/16167:
#0: 00000001951980c0 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x90/0x8d0 [kvm]
#1: 000000019599c0f0 (&kvm->srcu){....}, at: __vcpu_run+0x4bc/0xfd0 [kvm]
Last Breaking-Event-Address:
[<000003ff80429b34>] deliverable_irqs+0x10c/0x1d0 [kvm]
irq event stamp: 11967
hardirqs last enabled at (11975): [<00000001502992f2>] console_unlock+0x4ca/0x650
hardirqs last disabled at (11982): [<0000000150298ee8>] console_unlock+0xc0/0x650
softirqs last enabled at (7940): [<0000000150cba6ca>] __do_softirq+0x422/0x4d8
softirqs last disabled at (7929): [<00000001501cd688>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x70/0x80
Considering what's being done here, let's fix this by removing the
mutex assertion rather than acquiring the mutex for every other vcpu.
Fixes: 201ae986ead7 ("KVM: s390: protvirt: Implement interrupt injection")
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200415190353.63625-1-farman@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static unsigned long deliverable_irqs(st
if (psw_mchk_disabled(vcpu))
active_mask &= ~IRQ_PEND_MCHK_MASK;
/* PV guest cpus can have a single interruption injected at a time. */
- if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu) &&
+ if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_get_handle(vcpu) &&
vcpu->arch.sie_block->iictl != IICTL_CODE_NONE)
active_mask &= ~(IRQ_PEND_EXT_II_MASK |
IRQ_PEND_IO_MASK |