From d465767c5363a1ed907e52106189ecdc80aa2a1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 15:59:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: Streamle calls to task_rq_unlock()

References: bnc#1155798 (CPU scheduler functional and performance backports)
Patch-mainline: v5.4-rc1
Git-commit: 4b211f2b129dd1f6a6956bbc76e2f232c1ec3ad8

Calls to task_rq_unlock() are done several times in the
__sched_setscheduler() function.  This is fine when only the rq lock needs to be
handled but not so much when other locks come into play.

This patch streamlines the release of the rq lock so that only one
location need to be modified when dealing with more than one lock.

No change of functionality is introduced by this patch.

Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bristot@redhat.com
Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com
Cc: lizefan@huawei.com
Cc: longman@redhat.com
Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it
Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719140000.31694-3-juri.lelli@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index e951e8b874b3..2cfe282b1297 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4730,8 +4730,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
 	 * Changing the policy of the stop threads its a very bad idea:
 	 */
 	if (p == rq->stop) {
-		task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
-		return -EINVAL;
+		retval = -EINVAL;
+		goto unlock;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -4749,8 +4749,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
 			goto change;
 
 		p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork;
-		task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
-		return 0;
+		retval = 0;
+		goto unlock;
 	}
 change:
 
@@ -4763,8 +4763,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
 		if (rt_bandwidth_enabled() && rt_policy(policy) &&
 				task_group(p)->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime == 0 &&
 				!task_group_is_autogroup(task_group(p))) {
-			task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
-			return -EPERM;
+			retval = -EPERM;
+			goto unlock;
 		}
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -4779,8 +4779,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
 			 */
 			if (!cpumask_subset(span, p->cpus_ptr) ||
 			    rq->rd->dl_bw.bw == 0) {
-				task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
-				return -EPERM;
+				retval = -EPERM;
+				goto unlock;
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -4799,8 +4799,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
 	 * is available.
 	 */
 	if ((dl_policy(policy) || dl_task(p)) && sched_dl_overflow(p, policy, attr)) {
-		task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
-		return -EBUSY;
+		retval = -EBUSY;
+		goto unlock;
 	}
 
 	p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork;
@@ -4858,6 +4858,10 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
 	preempt_enable();
 
 	return 0;
+
+unlock:
+	task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
+	return retval;
 }
 
 static int _sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,