From be11d5559da54204cfb2c7e716d59fc765daea88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: guodeqing <geffrey.guo@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 16:12:08 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ipvs: fix the connection sync failed in some cases
Git-commit: 8210e344ccb798c672ab237b1a4f241bda08909b
Patch-mainline: v5.8-rc7
References: bsc#1174699
The sync_thread_backup only checks sk_receive_queue is empty or not,
there is a situation which cannot sync the connection entries when
sk_receive_queue is empty and sk_rmem_alloc is larger than sk_rcvbuf,
the sync packets are dropped in __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb, this is
because the packets in reader_queue is not read, so the rmem is
not reclaimed.
Here I add the check of whether the reader_queue of the udp sock is
empty or not to solve this problem.
Fixes: 2276f58ac589 ("udp: use a separate rx queue for packet reception")
Reported-by: zhouxudong <zhouxudong8@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: guodeqing <geffrey.guo@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Firo Yang <firo.yang@suse.com>
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
index 9f1aa78e837d..051fbdf5c5b2 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
@@ -1723,6 +1723,8 @@ static int sync_thread_backup(void *data)
{
struct ip_vs_sync_thread_data *tinfo = data;
struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = tinfo->ipvs;
+ struct sock *sk = tinfo->sock->sk;
+ struct udp_sock *up = udp_sk(sk);
int len;
pr_info("sync thread started: state = BACKUP, mcast_ifn = %s, "
@@ -1730,12 +1732,14 @@ static int sync_thread_backup(void *data)
ipvs->bcfg.mcast_ifn, ipvs->bcfg.syncid, tinfo->id);
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
- wait_event_interruptible(*sk_sleep(tinfo->sock->sk),
- !skb_queue_empty(&tinfo->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue)
- || kthread_should_stop());
+ wait_event_interruptible(*sk_sleep(sk),
+ !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue) ||
+ !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&up->reader_queue) ||
+ kthread_should_stop());
/* do we have data now? */
- while (!skb_queue_empty(&(tinfo->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue))) {
+ while (!skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue) ||
+ !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&up->reader_queue)) {
len = ip_vs_receive(tinfo->sock, tinfo->buf,
ipvs->bcfg.sync_maxlen);
if (len <= 0) {
--
2.16.4