From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 01:40:00 +0200
Subject: bpf, ppc64: implement jiting of BPF_J{LT, LE, SLT, SLE}
Patch-mainline: v4.14-rc1
Git-commit: 20dbf5ccbb27850a129695d4590f22a7e5459798
References: bsc#1083647
This work implements jiting of BPF_J{LT,LE,SLT,SLE} instructions
with BPF_X/BPF_K variants for the ppc64 eBPF JIT.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ static inline bool is_nearbranch(int off
#define COND_EQ (CR0_EQ | COND_CMP_TRUE)
#define COND_NE (CR0_EQ | COND_CMP_FALSE)
#define COND_LT (CR0_LT | COND_CMP_TRUE)
+#define COND_LE (CR0_GT | COND_CMP_FALSE)
#endif
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -795,12 +795,24 @@ emit_clear:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_X:
true_cond = COND_GT;
goto cond_branch;
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLT | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLT | BPF_X:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_X:
+ true_cond = COND_LT;
+ goto cond_branch;
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_X:
true_cond = COND_GE;
goto cond_branch;
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLE | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLE | BPF_X:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_X:
+ true_cond = COND_LE;
+ goto cond_branch;
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_X:
true_cond = COND_EQ;
@@ -817,14 +829,18 @@ emit_clear:
cond_branch:
switch (code) {
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGT | BPF_X:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLT | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_X:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLE | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JNE | BPF_X:
/* unsigned comparison */
PPC_CMPLD(dst_reg, src_reg);
break;
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_X:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_X:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_X:
/* signed comparison */
PPC_CMPD(dst_reg, src_reg);
break;
@@ -834,7 +850,9 @@ cond_branch:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JNE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGT | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLT | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLE | BPF_K:
/*
* Need sign-extended load, so only positive
* values can be used as imm in cmpldi
@@ -849,7 +867,9 @@ cond_branch:
}
break;
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K:
/*
* signed comparison, so any 16-bit value
* can be used in cmpdi