From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:07:18 +0100
Subject: x86/dumpstack: Handle stack overflow on all stacks
Git-commit: 6e60e583426c2f8751c22c2dfe5c207083b4483a
Patch-mainline: v4.15-rc5
References: bsc#1068032 CVE-2017-5754
We currently special-case stack overflow on the task stack. We're
going to start putting special stacks in the fixmap with a custom
layout, so they'll have guard pages, too. Teach the unwinder to be
able to unwind an overflow of any of the stacks.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: aliguori@amazon.com
Cc: daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at
Cc: hughd@google.com
Cc: keescook@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171204150605.802057305@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -126,24 +126,28 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_stru
* - task stack
* - interrupt stack
* - HW exception stacks (double fault, nmi, debug, mce)
+ * - SYSENTER stack
*
- * x86-32 can have up to three stacks:
+ * x86-32 can have up to four stacks:
* - task stack
* - softirq stack
* - hardirq stack
+ * - SYSENTER stack
*/
for (regs = NULL; stack; stack = PTR_ALIGN(stack_info.next_sp, sizeof(long))) {
const char *stack_name;
- /*
- * If we overflowed the task stack into a guard page, jump back
- * to the bottom of the usable stack.
- */
- if (task_stack_page(task) - (void *)stack < PAGE_SIZE)
- stack = task_stack_page(task);
-
- if (get_stack_info(stack, task, &stack_info, &visit_mask))
- break;
+ if (get_stack_info(stack, task, &stack_info, &visit_mask)) {
+ /*
+ * We weren't on a valid stack. It's possible that
+ * we overflowed a valid stack into a guard page.
+ * See if the next page up is valid so that we can
+ * generate some kind of backtrace if this happens.
+ */
+ stack = (unsigned long *)PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)stack);
+ if (get_stack_info(stack, task, &stack_info, &visit_mask))
+ break;
+ }
stack_name = stack_type_name(stack_info.type);
if (stack_name)