From d85608408bd98eae64252096eca1ecc7e0485b9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 20:37:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Consider also RCU depth in busy loop.

References: SLE Realtime Extension
Patch-mainline: Never, out-of-tree preempt-rt patch

intel_guc_send_busy_loop() looks at in_atomic() and irqs_disabled() to
decide if it should busy-spin while waiting or if it may sleep.
Both checks will report false on PREEMPT_RT if sleeping spinlocks are
acquired leading to RCU splats while the function sleeps.

Check also if RCU has been disabled.

Reported-by: "John B. Wyatt IV" <jwyatt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
index 2b6dfe62c8f2..28243efcaec2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static inline int intel_guc_send_busy_loop(struct intel_guc *guc,
 {
 	int err;
 	unsigned int sleep_period_ms = 1;
-	bool not_atomic = !in_atomic() && !irqs_disabled();
+	bool not_atomic = !in_atomic() && !irqs_disabled() && !rcu_preempt_depth();
 
 	/*
 	 * FIXME: Have caller pass in if we are in an atomic context to avoid