From f079b150cb6735eb7fd4f9e6494e881b8b0a5cbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 14:15:00 -0400
Subject: drm/i915/dpcd_bl: Return early in vesa_calc_max_backlight if we can't
read PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT
Git-commit: 17917ff62443414569ea76e151e7a7ef44812264
Patch-mainline: v5.15-rc1
References: jsc#PED-1166 jsc#PED-1168 jsc#PED-1170 jsc#PED-1218 jsc#PED-1220 jsc#PED-1222 jsc#PED-1223 jsc#PED-1225
If we can't read DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT in
intel_dp_aux_vesa_calc_max_backlight() but do have a valid PWM frequency
defined in the VBT, we'll keep going in the function until we inevitably
fail on reading DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT_CAP_MIN. There's not much point in
doing this, so just return early.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-7-lyude@redhat.com
Acked-by: Patrik Jakobsson <pjakobsson@suse.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
index 781c7cd98d75..bf8e4ed56847 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
@@ -449,11 +449,14 @@ static u32 intel_dp_aux_vesa_calc_max_backlight(struct intel_connector *connecto
int freq, fxp, fxp_min, fxp_max, fxp_actual, f = 1;
u8 pn, pn_min, pn_max;
- if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT, &pn) == 1) {
- pn &= DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT_MASK;
- max_backlight = (1 << pn) - 1;
+ if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT, &pn) != 1) {
+ drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Failed to read pwmgen bit count cap\n");
+ return 0;
}
+ pn &= DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT_MASK;
+ max_backlight = (1 << pn) - 1;
+
/* Find desired value of (F x P)
* Note that, if F x P is out of supported range, the maximum value or
* minimum value will applied automatically. So no need to check that.
--
2.38.1