From 46099ea1f174f707942bc17c4b8915f2b3016d75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 13:22:00 -0700
Subject: drm/panel-edp: Fix "prepare_to_enable" if panel doesn't handle HPD
Git-commit: a64ad9c3e4a53257a13aefe33741aad46e7b34de
Patch-mainline: v5.16-rc1
References: jsc#PED-1166 jsc#PED-1168 jsc#PED-1170 jsc#PED-1218 jsc#PED-1220 jsc#PED-1222 jsc#PED-1223 jsc#PED-1225
While cleaning up the descriptions of the delay for eDP panels I
realized that we'd have a bug if any panels need the
"prepare_to_enable" but HPD handling isn't happening in the panel
driver. Let's put in a stopgap to at least make us not violate
timings. This is not perfectly optimal but trying to do better is
hard. At the moment only 2 panels specify this delay and only 30 ms is
at stake. These panels are also currently hooked up with "hpd-gpios"
so effectively this "fix" is just a theoretical fix and won't actually
do anything for any devices currently supported in mainline.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.13.Ia8288d36df4b12770af59ae3ff73ef7e08fb4e2e@changeid
Acked-by: Patrik Jakobsson <pjakobsson@suse.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
index 1ce945ec3ecd..3e53be63cf2a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
@@ -508,12 +508,32 @@ static int panel_edp_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
static int panel_edp_enable(struct drm_panel *panel)
{
struct panel_edp *p = to_panel_edp(panel);
+ unsigned int delay;
if (p->enabled)
return 0;
- if (p->desc->delay.enable)
- msleep(p->desc->delay.enable);
+ delay = p->desc->delay.enable;
+
+ /*
+ * If there is a "prepare_to_enable" delay then that's supposed to be
+ * the delay from HPD going high until we can turn the backlight on.
+ * However, we can only count this if HPD is handled by the panel
+ * driver, not if it goes to a dedicated pin on the controller.
+ * If we aren't handling the HPD pin ourselves then the best we
+ * can do is assume that HPD went high immediately before we were
+ * called (and link training took zero time).
+ *
+ * NOTE: if we ever end up in this "if" statement then we're
+ * guaranteed that the panel_edp_wait() call below will do no delay.
+ * It already handles that case, though, so we don't need any special
+ * code for it.
+ */
+ if (p->desc->delay.prepare_to_enable && !p->hpd_gpio && !p->no_hpd)
+ delay = max(delay, p->desc->delay.prepare_to_enable);
+
+ if (delay)
+ msleep(delay);
panel_edp_wait(p->prepared_time, p->desc->delay.prepare_to_enable);
--
2.38.1