Blob Blame History Raw
From aded752fe0c45379113dcde715794ed9a47d0194 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:59:38 +0100
Subject: drm/i915: Trim set_timer_ms() intervals
Git-commit: f4bb45f727341126aa81d8ac2f3e45c7029fe448
Patch-mainline: v5.9-rc1
References: jsc#SLE-12680, jsc#SLE-12880, jsc#SLE-12882, jsc#SLE-12883, jsc#SLE-13496, jsc#SLE-15322

Use the plain msec_to_jiffies() rather than the _timeout variant so we
round down and do not add an extra jiffy to our interval. For example,
with timeslicing we do not want to err on the longer side as any
fairness depends on catching hogging contexts on the GPU. Bring on
CFS.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200604135938.3975-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <pjakobsson@suse.de>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 29 +++++++++++---------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c      |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
index 3e35a45d6218..67d74e6432a8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
@@ -1140,9 +1140,17 @@ static struct i915_request *nop_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	return rq;
 }
 
-static long timeslice_threshold(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+static long slice_timeout(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
-	return 2 * msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(timeslice(engine)) + 1;
+	long timeout;
+
+	/* Enough time for a timeslice to kick in, and kick out */
+	timeout = 2 * msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(timeslice(engine));
+
+	/* Enough time for the nop request to complete */
+	timeout += HZ / 5;
+
+	return timeout + 1;
 }
 
 static int live_timeslice_queue(void *arg)
@@ -1260,7 +1268,7 @@ static int live_timeslice_queue(void *arg)
 		}
 
 		/* Timeslice every jiffy, so within 2 we should signal */
-		if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, timeslice_threshold(engine)) < 0) {
+		if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, slice_timeout(engine)) < 0) {
 			struct drm_printer p =
 				drm_info_printer(gt->i915->drm.dev);
 
@@ -1379,7 +1387,7 @@ static int live_timeslice_nopreempt(void *arg)
 		 * allow the maximum priority barrier through. Wait long
 		 * enough to see if it is timesliced in by mistake.
 		 */
-		if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, timeslice_threshold(engine)) >= 0) {
+		if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, slice_timeout(engine)) >= 0) {
 			pr_err("%s: I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER request completed, bypassing no-preempt request\n",
 			       engine->name);
 			err = -EINVAL;
@@ -3890,19 +3898,6 @@ static int live_virtual_mask(void *arg)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static long slice_timeout(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
-{
-	long timeout;
-
-	/* Enough time for a timeslice to kick in, and kick out */
-	timeout = 2 * msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(timeslice(engine));
-
-	/* Enough time for the nop request to complete */
-	timeout += HZ / 5;
-
-	return timeout;
-}
-
 static int slicein_virtual_engine(struct intel_gt *gt,
 				  struct intel_engine_cs **siblings,
 				  unsigned int nsibling)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c
index e28eae4a8f70..f42a9e9a0b4f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ void set_timer_ms(struct timer_list *t, unsigned long timeout)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	timeout = msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(timeout);
+	timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
 
 	/*
 	 * Paranoia to make sure the compiler computes the timeout before
-- 
2.29.2