From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:09:49 +0200
Subject: ACPI/PCI: pci_link: use extended_irq union member when setting
 ext-irq shareable
Patch-mainline: v5.7-rc3
Git-commit: 1c5e1cdd7c1f34e6d7f22f9b819a307e435e780e
References: jsc#SLE-16407

The case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ inside acpi_pci_link_set()
is correctly using resource->res.data.extended_irq.foo for most settings,
but for the shareable setting it so far has accidentally been using
resource->res.data.irq.shareable instead of
resource->res.data.extended_irq.shareable.

Note that the old code happens to also work because the shareable field
offset is the same for both the acpi_resource_irq and
acpi_resource_extended_irq structs.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -322,10 +322,10 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi
 		resource->res.data.extended_irq.polarity =
 		    link->irq.polarity;
 		if (link->irq.triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE)
-			resource->res.data.irq.shareable =
+			resource->res.data.extended_irq.shareable =
 			    ACPI_EXCLUSIVE;
 		else
-			resource->res.data.irq.shareable = ACPI_SHARED;
+			resource->res.data.extended_irq.shareable = ACPI_SHARED;
 		resource->res.data.extended_irq.interrupt_count = 1;
 		resource->res.data.extended_irq.interrupts[0] = irq;
 		/* ignore resource_source, it's optional */