From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:38:01 -0700
Subject: bpf: Test_verifier, #65 error message updates for trunc of
boundary-cross
Patch-mainline: v5.7-rc1
Git-commit: 32f13a5add87caf11e9dd262372b4a2b79c57aa5
References: bsc#1177028
After changes to add update_reg_bounds after ALU ops and 32-bit bounds
tracking truncation of boundary crossing range will fail earlier and with
a different error message. Now the test error trace is the following
11: (17) r1 -= 2147483584
12: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=invP(id=0,smin_value=-2147483584,smax_value=63)
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
12: (17) r1 -= 2147483584
13: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=invP(id=0,
umin_value=18446744069414584448,umax_value=18446744071562068095,
var_off=(0xffffffff00000000; 0xffffffff))
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
13: (77) r1 >>= 8
14: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=invP(id=0,
umin_value=72057594021150720,umax_value=72057594029539328,
var_off=(0xffffffff000000; 0xffffff),
s32_min_value=-16777216,s32_max_value=-1,
u32_min_value=-16777216)
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
14: (0f) r0 += r1
value 72057594021150720 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds
Because we have 'umin_value == umax_value' instead of previously
where 'umin_value != umax_value' we can now fail earlier noting
that pointer addition is out of bounds.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560428103.10843.6316594510312781186.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
Acked-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
@@ -257,17 +257,15 @@
* [0x00ff'ffff'ff00'0000, 0x00ff'ffff'ffff'ffff]
*/
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_1, 8),
- /* no-op or OOB pointer computation */
+ /* error on OOB pointer computation */
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
- /* potentially OOB access */
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
/* exit */
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
/* not actually fully unbounded, but the bound is very high */
- .errstr = "R0 unbounded memory access",
+ .errstr = "value 72057594021150720 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds",
.result = REJECT
},
{
@@ -299,17 +297,15 @@
* [0x00ff'ffff'ff00'0000, 0x00ff'ffff'ffff'ffff]
*/
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_1, 8),
- /* no-op or OOB pointer computation */
+ /* error on OOB pointer computation */
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
- /* potentially OOB access */
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
/* exit */
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
/* not actually fully unbounded, but the bound is very high */
- .errstr = "R0 unbounded memory access",
+ .errstr = "value 72057594021150720 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds",
.result = REJECT
},
{