From f0d1ab0526408c28f40836254a5e7be794074b6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 13:58:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: of: Normalize return code variable name
Git-commit: f0d1ab0526408c28f40836254a5e7be794074b6d
Patch-mainline: v5.4-rc1
References: jsc#SLE-12730

It is confusing to name return variables mixedly "status",
"err" or "ret". I just changed them all to "ret", by personal
preference, to lower cognitive stress.

Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190716115854.12098-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
index e39b4290b80c..28233d3772f4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static int of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip) { return 0; }
 
 int of_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 {
-	int status;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!chip->of_node)
 		return 0;
@@ -863,9 +863,9 @@ int of_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 
 	of_gpiochip_init_valid_mask(chip);
 
-	status = of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(chip);
-	if (status)
-		return status;
+	ret = of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(chip);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	/* If the chip defines names itself, these take precedence */
 	if (!chip->names)
@@ -874,13 +874,13 @@ int of_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 
 	of_node_get(chip->of_node);
 
-	status = of_gpiochip_scan_gpios(chip);
-	if (status) {
+	ret = of_gpiochip_scan_gpios(chip);
+	if (ret) {
 		of_node_put(chip->of_node);
 		gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(chip);
 	}
 
-	return status;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 void of_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
-- 
2.16.4