From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 13:55:54 +0200
Subject: i2c: exynos5: Remove IRQF_ONESHOT
Patch-mainline: v5.4-rc1
Git-commit: 41d529d6227c443a5827cb8b8f040402dedcf3d2
References: bsc#1162702

The drivers sets IRQF_ONESHOT and passes only a primary handler. The IRQ
is masked while the primary is handler is invoked independently of
IRQF_ONESHOT.
With IRQF_ONESHOT the core code will not force-thread the interrupt and
this is probably not intended. I *assume* that the original author copied
the IRQ registration from another driver which passed a primary and
secondary handler and removed the secondary handler but keeping the
ONESHOT flag.

Remove IRQF_ONESHOT.

Reported-by: Benjamin Rouxel <benjamin.rouxel@uva.nl>
Tested-by: Benjamin Rouxel <benjamin.rouxel@uva.nl>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Acked-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
@@ -791,9 +791,7 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_probe(struct plat
 	}
 
 	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, i2c->irq, exynos5_i2c_irq,
-				IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
-				dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c);
-
+			       IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c);
 	if (ret != 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot request HS-I2C IRQ %d\n", i2c->irq);
 		goto err_clk;