From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:49:16 +0800
Subject: iommu/vt-d: Fix PASID devTLB invalidation
Git-commit: e7e69461a83264dbce2b4ff480f858f3f1454db7
Patch-mainline: v5.9-rc1
References: bsc#1176361
DevTLB flush can be used for both DMA request with and without PASIDs.
The former uses PASID#0 (RID2PASID), latter uses non-zero PASID for SVA
usage.
This patch adds a check for PASID value such that devTLB flush with
PASID is used for SVA case. This is more efficient in that multiple
PASIDs can be used by a single device, when tearing down a PASID entry
we shall flush only the devTLB specific to a PASID.
Fixes: 6f7db75e1c46 ("iommu/vt-d: Add second level page table")
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724014925.15523-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
@@ -486,7 +486,16 @@ devtlb_invalidation_with_pasid(struct in
qdep = info->ats_qdep;
pfsid = info->pfsid;
- qi_flush_dev_iotlb(iommu, sid, pfsid, qdep, 0, 64 - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
+ /*
+ * When PASID 0 is used, it indicates RID2PASID(DMA request w/o PASID),
+ * devTLB flush w/o PASID should be used. For non-zero PASID under
+ * SVA usage, device could do DMA with multiple PASIDs. It is more
+ * efficient to flush devTLB specific to the PASID.
+ */
+ if (pasid == PASID_RID2PASID)
+ qi_flush_dev_iotlb(iommu, sid, pfsid, qdep, 0, 64 - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
+ else
+ qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(iommu, sid, pfsid, pasid, qdep, 0, 64 - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
}
void intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev,