From: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 16:32:32 -0800
Subject: libbpf: Assume unsigned values for BTF_KIND_ENUM
Patch-mainline: v5.7-rc1
Git-commit: 7cb30aaab3f277aa88e20a008faf57e0fb1119ec
References: bsc#1177028

Currently, BTF_KIND_ENUM type doesn't record whether enum values should be
interpreted as signed or unsigned. In Linux, most enums are unsigned, though,
so interpreting them as unsigned matches real world better.

Change btf_dump test case to test maximum 32-bit value, instead of negative
value.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200303003233.3496043-3-andriin@fb.com
Acked-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c                                      |    8 ++++----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_dump_test_case_syntax.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
@@ -916,13 +916,13 @@ static void btf_dump_emit_enum_def(struc
 			/* enumerators share namespace with typedef idents */
 			dup_cnt = btf_dump_name_dups(d, d->ident_names, name);
 			if (dup_cnt > 1) {
-				btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s%s___%zu = %d,",
+				btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s%s___%zu = %u,",
 						pfx(lvl + 1), name, dup_cnt,
-						(__s32)v->val);
+						(__u32)v->val);
 			} else {
-				btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s%s = %d,",
+				btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s%s = %u,",
 						pfx(lvl + 1), name,
-						(__s32)v->val);
+						(__u32)v->val);
 			}
 		}
 		btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s}", pfx(lvl));
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_dump_test_case_syntax.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_dump_test_case_syntax.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ enum e1 {
 
 enum e2 {
 	C = 100,
-	D = -100,
+	D = 4294967295,
 	E = 0,
 };