From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 15:42:51 -0700
Subject: rcu: Add destroy_work_on_stack() to match INIT_WORK_ONSTACK()
Git-commit: fbad01af8c3bb9618848abde8054ab7e0c2330fe
Patch-mainline: 5.4-rc1
References: bnc#1151927 5.3.4

The synchronize_rcu_expedited() function has an INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(),
but lacks the corresponding destroy_work_on_stack().  This commit
therefore adds destroy_work_on_stack().

Reported-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h |    6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(stru
  */
 void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 {
+	bool boottime = (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INIT);
 	struct rcu_exp_work rew;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 	unsigned long s;
@@ -817,7 +818,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 		return;  /* Someone else did our work for us. */
 
 	/* Ensure that load happens before action based on it. */
-	if (unlikely(rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INIT)) {
+	if (unlikely(boottime)) {
 		/* Direct call during scheduler init and early_initcalls(). */
 		rcu_exp_sel_wait_wake(s);
 	} else {
@@ -835,5 +836,8 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 
 	/* Let the next expedited grace period start. */
 	mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.exp_mutex);
+
+	if (likely(!boottime))
+		destroy_work_on_stack(&rew.rew_work);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited);