From: He Fengqing <hefengqing@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 10:29:36 +0000
Subject: bpf: Fix possible race in inc_misses_counter
Patch-mainline: v5.17-rc3
Git-commit: 0e3135d3bfa5dfb658145238d2bc723a8e30c3a3
References: jsc#PED-1368

It seems inc_misses_counter() suffers from same issue fixed in
the commit d979617aa84d ("bpf: Fixes possible race in update_prog_stats()
for 32bit arches"):
As it can run while interrupts are enabled, it could
be re-entered and the u64_stats syncp could be mangled.

Fixes: 9ed9e9ba2337 ("bpf: Count the number of times recursion was prevented")
Signed-off-by: He Fengqing <hefengqing@huawei.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220122102936.1219518-1-hefengqing@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -550,11 +550,12 @@ static __always_inline u64 notrace bpf_p
 static void notrace inc_misses_counter(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	struct bpf_prog_stats *stats;
+	unsigned int flags;
 
 	stats = this_cpu_ptr(prog->stats);
-	u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
+	flags = u64_stats_update_begin_irqsave(&stats->syncp);
 	u64_stats_inc(&stats->misses);
-	u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp);
+	u64_stats_update_end_irqrestore(&stats->syncp, flags);
 }
 
 /* The logic is similar to bpf_prog_run(), but with an explicit