From bc85494ab472e66b806e15ae1abe11ff9f549e7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:36:25 -0700
Subject: drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison
Git-commit: c314b693954075791ed11dce3c68f920409b5de4
Patch-mainline: v5.15-rc1
References: jsc#SLE-22601
Although we're converting our workarounds to use a revid->stepping
lookup table, the function that detects pre-production hardware should
continue to compare against PCI revision ID values directly. These are
listed in the bspec as integers, so it's easier to confirm their
correctness if we just use an integer literal rather than a symbolic
name anyway.
Bspec: 13620, 19131, 13626, 18329
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713193635.3390052-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <pjakobsson@suse.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 30d8cd8c69b1..90136995f5eb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -271,10 +271,10 @@ static void intel_detect_preproduction_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
bool pre = false;
pre |= IS_HSW_EARLY_SDV(dev_priv);
- pre |= IS_SKL_REVID(dev_priv, 0, SKL_REVID_F0);
- pre |= IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_B_LAST);
- pre |= IS_KBL_GT_STEP(dev_priv, 0, STEP_A0);
- pre |= IS_GLK_REVID(dev_priv, 0, GLK_REVID_A2);
+ pre |= IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x6;
+ pre |= IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0xA;
+ pre |= IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x1;
+ pre |= IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x3;
if (pre) {
drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "This is a pre-production stepping. "
--
2.33.1