From 7d8a3a477b3e25ada8dc71d22048c2ea417209a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 23:21:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ax25: Fix ax25 session cleanup problems
Git-commit: 7d8a3a477b3e25ada8dc71d22048c2ea417209a0
Patch-mainline: v5.19-rc1
References: git-fixes

[ backport note: replaced dev_{hold,put}_track() without _track -- tiwai ]

There are session cleanup problems in ax25_release() and
ax25_disconnect(). If we setup a session and then disconnect,
the disconnected session is still in "LISTENING" state that
is shown below.

Active AX.25 sockets
Dest       Source     Device  State        Vr/Vs    Send-Q  Recv-Q
DL9SAU-4   DL9SAU-3   ???     LISTENING    000/000  0       0
DL9SAU-3   DL9SAU-4   ???     LISTENING    000/000  0       0

The first reason is caused by del_timer_sync() in ax25_release().
The timers of ax25 are used for correct session cleanup. If we use
ax25_release() to close ax25 sessions and ax25_dev is not null,
the del_timer_sync() functions in ax25_release() will execute.
As a result, the sessions could not be cleaned up correctly,
because the timers have stopped.

In order to solve this problem, this patch adds a device_up flag
in ax25_dev in order to judge whether the device is up. If there
are sessions to be cleaned up, the del_timer_sync() in
ax25_release() will not execute. What's more, we add ax25_cb_del()
in ax25_kill_by_device(), because the timers have been stopped
and there are no functions that could delete ax25_cb if we do not
call ax25_release(). Finally, we reorder the position of
ax25_list_lock in ax25_cb_del() in order to synchronize among
different functions that call ax25_cb_del().

The second reason is caused by improper check in ax25_disconnect().
The incoming ax25 sessions which ax25->sk is null will close
heartbeat timer, because the check "if(!ax25->sk || ..)" is
satisfied. As a result, the session could not be cleaned up properly.

In order to solve this problem, this patch changes the improper
check to "if(ax25->sk && ..)" in ax25_disconnect().

What`s more, the ax25_disconnect() may be called twice, which is
not necessary. For example, ax25_kill_by_device() calls
ax25_disconnect() and sets ax25->state to AX25_STATE_0, but
ax25_release() calls ax25_disconnect() again.

In order to solve this problem, this patch add a check in
ax25_release(). If the flag of ax25->sk equals to SOCK_DEAD,
the ax25_disconnect() in ax25_release() should not be executed.

Fixes: 82e31755e55f ("ax25: Fix UAF bugs in ax25 timers")
Fixes: 8a367e74c012 ("ax25: Fix segfault after sock connection timeout")
Reported-and-tested-by: Thomas Osterried <thomas@osterried.de>
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220530152158.108619-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 include/net/ax25.h   |    1 +
 net/ax25/af_ax25.c   |   27 +++++++++++++++++----------
 net/ax25/ax25_dev.c  |    1 +
 net/ax25/ax25_subr.c |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/include/net/ax25.h
+++ b/include/net/ax25.h
@@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ typedef struct ax25_dev {
 	ax25_dama_info		dama;
 #endif
 	refcount_t		refcount;
+	bool device_up;
 } ax25_dev;
 
 typedef struct ax25_cb {
--- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
+++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
@@ -62,12 +62,12 @@ static void ax25_free_sock(struct sock *
  */
 static void ax25_cb_del(ax25_cb *ax25)
 {
+	spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
 	if (!hlist_unhashed(&ax25->ax25_node)) {
-		spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
 		hlist_del_init(&ax25->ax25_node);
-		spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
 		ax25_cb_put(ax25);
 	}
+	spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct n
 
 	if ((ax25_dev = ax25_dev_ax25dev(dev)) == NULL)
 		return;
+	ax25_dev->device_up = false;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
 again:
@@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ again:
 				spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
 				ax25_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH);
 				s->ax25_dev = NULL;
+				ax25_cb_del(s);
 				spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
 				goto again;
 			}
@@ -103,6 +105,7 @@ again:
 				dev_put(ax25_dev->dev);
 				ax25_dev_put(ax25_dev);
 			}
+			ax25_cb_del(s);
 			release_sock(sk);
 			spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
 			sock_put(sk);
@@ -995,9 +998,11 @@ static int ax25_release(struct socket *s
 	if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) {
 		switch (ax25->state) {
 		case AX25_STATE_0:
-			release_sock(sk);
-			ax25_disconnect(ax25, 0);
-			lock_sock(sk);
+			if (!sock_flag(ax25->sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
+				release_sock(sk);
+				ax25_disconnect(ax25, 0);
+				lock_sock(sk);
+			}
 			ax25_destroy_socket(ax25);
 			break;
 
@@ -1053,11 +1058,13 @@ static int ax25_release(struct socket *s
 		ax25_destroy_socket(ax25);
 	}
 	if (ax25_dev) {
-		del_timer_sync(&ax25->timer);
-		del_timer_sync(&ax25->t1timer);
-		del_timer_sync(&ax25->t2timer);
-		del_timer_sync(&ax25->t3timer);
-		del_timer_sync(&ax25->idletimer);
+		if (!ax25_dev->device_up) {
+			del_timer_sync(&ax25->timer);
+			del_timer_sync(&ax25->t1timer);
+			del_timer_sync(&ax25->t2timer);
+			del_timer_sync(&ax25->t3timer);
+			del_timer_sync(&ax25->idletimer);
+		}
 		dev_put(ax25_dev->dev);
 		ax25_dev_put(ax25_dev);
 	}
--- a/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c
+++ b/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void ax25_dev_device_up(struct net_devic
 	ax25_dev->dev     = dev;
 	dev_hold(dev);
 	ax25_dev->forward = NULL;
+	ax25_dev->device_up = true;
 
 	ax25_dev->values[AX25_VALUES_IPDEFMODE] = AX25_DEF_IPDEFMODE;
 	ax25_dev->values[AX25_VALUES_AXDEFMODE] = AX25_DEF_AXDEFMODE;
--- a/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c
+++ b/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ void ax25_disconnect(ax25_cb *ax25, int
 		del_timer_sync(&ax25->t3timer);
 		del_timer_sync(&ax25->idletimer);
 	} else {
-		if (!ax25->sk || !sock_flag(ax25->sk, SOCK_DESTROY))
+		if (ax25->sk && !sock_flag(ax25->sk, SOCK_DESTROY))
 			ax25_stop_heartbeat(ax25);
 		ax25_stop_t1timer(ax25);
 		ax25_stop_t2timer(ax25);