From c0bed69daf4b67809b58cc7cd81a8fa4f45bc161 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 15:59:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] locking: Make owner_on_cpu() into <linux/sched.h>
Git-commit: c0bed69daf4b67809b58cc7cd81a8fa4f45bc161
Patch-mainline: v5.17-rc1
References: bsc#1190137 bsc#1189998

Move the owner_on_cpu() from kernel/locking/rwsem.c into
include/linux/sched.h with under CONFIG_SMP, then use it
in the mutex/rwsem/rtmutex to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211203075935.136808-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>

---
 include/linux/sched.h    |  9 +++++++++
 kernel/locking/mutex.c   | 11 ++---------
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c |  5 ++---
 kernel/locking/rwsem.c   |  9 ---------
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e919b3075979..38bf9d695fd1 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2154,6 +2154,15 @@ extern long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask);
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static inline bool owner_on_cpu(struct task_struct *owner)
+{
+	/*
+	 * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if
+	 * task is not on cpu or its cpu is preempted
+	 */
+	return owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
+}
+
 /* Returns effective CPU energy utilization, as seen by the scheduler */
 unsigned long sched_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long max);
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index db1913611192..5e3585950ec8 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -367,8 +367,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner,
 		/*
 		 * Use vcpu_is_preempted to detect lock holder preemption issue.
 		 */
-		if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched() ||
-				vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) {
+		if (!owner_on_cpu(owner) || need_resched()) {
 			ret = false;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -403,14 +402,8 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
 	 * structure won't go away during the spinning period.
 	 */
 	owner = __mutex_owner(lock);
-
-	/*
-	 * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if task is not
-	 * on cpu or its cpu is preempted
-	 */
-
 	if (owner)
-		retval = owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
+		retval = owner_on_cpu(owner);
 
 	/*
 	 * If lock->owner is not set, the mutex has been released. Return true
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index e85d5df3f42c..8555c4efe97c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1382,9 +1382,8 @@ static bool rtmutex_spin_on_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 		 *    for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y)
 		 *  - the VCPU on which owner runs is preempted
 		 */
-		if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched() ||
-		    !rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter) ||
-		    vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) {
+		if (!owner_on_cpu(owner) || need_resched() ||
+		    !rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter)) {
 			res = false;
 			break;
 		}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 04a74d040a6d..69aba4abe104 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -658,15 +658,6 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline bool owner_on_cpu(struct task_struct *owner)
-{
-	/*
-	 * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if
-	 * task is not on cpu or its cpu is preempted
-	 */
-	return owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
-}
-
 static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
 	struct task_struct *owner;
-- 
2.35.1