From fc21193ca7d9a6b4fb359b1e55051b6886472322 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 09:55:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Enlarge select() timeout for test_maps
Git-commit: 2d82d73da35b72b53fe0d96350a2b8d929d07e42
Patch-mainline: v5.15-rc1
References: stable-5.14.6
[ Upstream commit 2d82d73da35b72b53fe0d96350a2b8d929d07e42 ]
0Day robot observed that it's easily timeout on a heavy load host.
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
-------------------
# selftests: bpf: test_maps
# Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
# Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
# Failed sockmap unexpected timeout
not ok 3 selftests: bpf: test_maps # exit=1
# selftests: bpf: test_lru_map
# nr_cpus:8
-------------------
Since this test will be scheduled by 0Day to a random host that could have
only a few cpus(2-8), enlarge the timeout to avoid a false NG report.
In practice, i tried to pin it to only one cpu by 'taskset 0x01 ./test_maps',
and knew 10S is likely enough, but i still perfer to a larger value 30.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210820015556.23276-2-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index abdfc41f7685..4fd01450a408 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -985,7 +985,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
FD_ZERO(&w);
FD_SET(sfd[3], &w);
- to.tv_sec = 1;
+ to.tv_sec = 30;
to.tv_usec = 0;
s = select(sfd[3] + 1, &w, NULL, NULL, &to);
if (s == -1) {
--
2.26.2