From: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 20:35:57 +0800
Subject: ARM: s3c: irq-s3c24xx: Fix return value check for s3c24xx_init_intc()
Git-commit: 2aa717473ce96c93ae43a5dc8c23cedc8ce7dd9f
Patch-mainline: v5.16-rc1
References: git-fixes
The s3c24xx_init_intc() returns an error pointer upon failure, not NULL.
let's add an error pointer check in s3c24xx_handle_irq.
s3c_intc[0] is not NULL or ERR, we can simplify the code.
Fixes: 1f629b7a3ced ("ARM: S3C24XX: transform irq handling into a declarative form")
Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210901123557.1043953-1-liu.yun@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
[iivanov: %s:arch/arm/mach-s3c:drivers/irqchip:g]
Acked-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@suse.de>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-s3c24xx.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-s3c24xx.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-s3c24xx.c
@@ -359,11 +359,25 @@ static inline int s3c24xx_handle_intc(st
asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry s3c24xx_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
do {
- if (likely(s3c_intc[0]))
- if (s3c24xx_handle_intc(s3c_intc[0], regs, 0))
- continue;
+ /*
+ * For platform based machines, neither ERR nor NULL can happen here.
+ * The s3c24xx_handle_irq() will be set as IRQ handler iff this succeeds:
+ *
+ * s3c_intc[0] = s3c24xx_init_intc()
+ *
+ * If this fails, the next calls to s3c24xx_init_intc() won't be executed.
+ *
+ * For DT machine, s3c_init_intc_of() could set the IRQ handler without
+ * setting s3c_intc[0] only if it was called with num_ctrl=0. There is no
+ * such code path, so again the s3c_intc[0] will have a valid pointer if
+ * set_handle_irq() is called.
+ *
+ * Therefore in s3c24xx_handle_irq(), the s3c_intc[0] is always something.
+ */
+ if (s3c24xx_handle_intc(s3c_intc[0], regs, 0))
+ continue;
- if (s3c_intc[2])
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(s3c_intc[2]))
if (s3c24xx_handle_intc(s3c_intc[2], regs, 64))
continue;