From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:29:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fs/dcache: disable preemption on i_dir_seq's write side
Git-repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wagi/linux-stable-rt.git
Git-commit: e14cf4464ab5581e59e3a342a67f4e3672995edd
Patch-mainline: Queued in subsystem maintainer repository
References: SLE Realtime Extension

i_dir_seq is an opencoded seqcounter. Based on the code it looks like we
could have two writers in parallel despite the fact that the d_lock is
held. The problem is that during the write process on RT the preemption
is still enabled and if this process is interrupted by a reader with RT
priority then we lock up.
To avoid that lock up I am disabling the preemption during the update.
The rename of i_dir_seq is here to ensure to catch new write sides in
future.

Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Oleg.Karfich@wago.com
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
---
 fs/dcache.c        |   12 +++++++-----
 fs/inode.c         |    2 +-
 include/linux/fs.h |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -2482,9 +2482,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_rehash);
 static inline unsigned start_dir_add(struct inode *dir)
 {
 
+	preempt_disable_rt();
 	for (;;) {
-		unsigned n = dir->i_dir_seq;
-		if (!(n & 1) && cmpxchg(&dir->i_dir_seq, n, n + 1) == n)
+		unsigned n = dir->__i_dir_seq;
+		if (!(n & 1) && cmpxchg(&dir->__i_dir_seq, n, n + 1) == n)
 			return n;
 		cpu_relax();
 	}
@@ -2492,7 +2493,8 @@ static inline unsigned start_dir_add(str
 
 static inline void end_dir_add(struct inode *dir, unsigned n)
 {
-	smp_store_release(&dir->i_dir_seq, n + 2);
+	smp_store_release(&dir->__i_dir_seq, n + 2);
+	preempt_enable_rt();
 }
 
 static void d_wait_lookup(struct dentry *dentry)
@@ -2525,7 +2527,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc_parallel(struct d
 
 retry:
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	seq = smp_load_acquire(&parent->d_inode->i_dir_seq);
+	seq = smp_load_acquire(&parent->d_inode->__i_dir_seq);
 	r_seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
 	dentry = __d_lookup_rcu(parent, name, &d_seq);
 	if (unlikely(dentry)) {
@@ -2553,7 +2555,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc_parallel(struct d
 	}
 
 	hlist_bl_lock(b);
-	if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(parent->d_inode->i_dir_seq) != seq)) {
+	if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(parent->d_inode->__i_dir_seq) != seq)) {
 		hlist_bl_unlock(b);
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 		goto retry;
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ int inode_init_always(struct super_block
 	inode->i_bdev = NULL;
 	inode->i_cdev = NULL;
 	inode->i_link = NULL;
-	inode->i_dir_seq = 0;
+	inode->__i_dir_seq = 0;
 	inode->i_rdev = 0;
 	inode->dirtied_when = 0;
 
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ struct inode {
 		struct block_device	*i_bdev;
 		struct cdev		*i_cdev;
 		char			*i_link;
-		unsigned		i_dir_seq;
+		unsigned		__i_dir_seq;
 	};
 
 	__u32			i_generation;