From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:52:02 +0800
Subject: blk-mq: don't grab rq's refcount in blk_mq_check_expired()
Patch-mainline: v5.14-rc7
Git-commit: c797b40ccc340b8a66f7a7842aecc90bf749f087
References: bsc#1193787 git-fixes

Inside blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() we already grabbed request's
refcount before calling ->fn(), so needn't to grab it one more time
in blk_mq_check_expired().

Meantime remove extra request expire check in blk_mq_check_expired().

Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210811155202.629575-1-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Acked-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
---
 block/blk-mq.c |   30 +++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -941,34 +941,14 @@ static bool blk_mq_check_expired(struct
 	unsigned long *next = priv;
 
 	/*
-	 * Just do a quick check if it is expired before locking the request in
-	 * so we're not unnecessarilly synchronizing across CPUs.
-	 */
-	if (!blk_mq_req_expired(rq, next))
-		return true;
-
-	/*
-	 * We have reason to believe the request may be expired. Take a
-	 * reference on the request to lock this request lifetime into its
-	 * currently allocated context to prevent it from being reallocated in
-	 * the event the completion by-passes this timeout handler.
-	 *
-	 * If the reference was already released, then the driver beat the
-	 * timeout handler to posting a natural completion.
-	 */
-	if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref))
-		return true;
-
-	/*
-	 * The request is now locked and cannot be reallocated underneath the
-	 * timeout handler's processing. Re-verify this exact request is truly
-	 * expired; if it is not expired, then the request was completed and
-	 * reallocated as a new request.
+	 * blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() has locked the request, so it cannot
+	 * be reallocated underneath the timeout handler's processing, then
+	 * the expire check is reliable. If the request is not expired, then
+	 * it was completed and reallocated as a new request after returning
+	 * from blk_mq_check_expired().
 	 */
 	if (blk_mq_req_expired(rq, next))
 		blk_mq_rq_timed_out(rq, reserved);
-
-	blk_mq_put_rq_ref(rq);
 	return true;
 }