From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:19:33 -0800
Subject: bpf: Switch to offsetofend in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN
Patch-mainline: v5.6-rc1
Git-commit: b590cb5f802dc20c72f507f7fbe6737222d0afba
References: bsc#1177028

Switch existing pattern of "offsetof(..., member) + FIELD_SIZEOF(...,
member)' to "offsetofend(..., member)" which does exactly what
we need without all the copy-paste.

Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191210191933.105321-1-sdf@google.com
Acked-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c |   12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -252,22 +252,19 @@ static int convert___skb_to_skb(struct s
 
 	/* priority is allowed */
 
-	if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, priority) +
-			   FIELD_SIZEOF(struct __sk_buff, priority),
+	if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, priority),
 			   offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* cb is allowed */
 
-	if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb) +
-			   FIELD_SIZEOF(struct __sk_buff, cb),
+	if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, cb),
 			   offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* tstamp is allowed */
 
-	if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp) +
-			   FIELD_SIZEOF(struct __sk_buff, tstamp),
+	if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, tstamp),
 			   sizeof(struct __sk_buff)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -437,8 +434,7 @@ static int verify_user_bpf_flow_keys(str
 
 	/* flags is allowed */
 
-	if (!range_is_zero(ctx, offsetof(struct bpf_flow_keys, flags) +
-			   FIELD_SIZEOF(struct bpf_flow_keys, flags),
+	if (!range_is_zero(ctx, offsetofend(struct bpf_flow_keys, flags),
 			   sizeof(struct bpf_flow_keys)))
 		return -EINVAL;