From ca6e09cd086d9383b372b026dd3325a26eb852c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:34:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] xfrm: Fix RCU vs hash_resize_mutex lock inversion

Patch-mainline: v5.14-rc5
Git-commit: 2580d3f40022642452dd8422bfb8c22e54cf84bb
References: bsc#1185675

xfrm_bydst_resize() calls synchronize_rcu() while holding
hash_resize_mutex. But then on PREEMPT_RT configurations,
xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype() may acquire that mutex while running in an
RCU read side critical section. This results in a deadlock.

In fact the scope of hash_resize_mutex is way beyond the purpose of
xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype() to just fetch a coherent and stable policy
for a given destination/direction, along with other details.

The lower level net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock, which among other things
protects per destination/direction references to policy entries, is
enough to serialize and benefit from priority inheritance against the
write side. As a bonus, it makes it officially a per network namespace
synchronization business where a policy table resize on namespace A
shouldn't block a policy lookup on namespace B.

Fixes: 77cc278f7b20 (xfrm: policy: Use sequence counters with associated lock)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
 include/net/netns/xfrm.h |  1 +
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c   | 17 ++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/include/net/netns/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/netns/xfrm.h
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct netns_xfrm {
 #endif
 	spinlock_t		xfrm_state_lock;
 	seqcount_spinlock_t	xfrm_state_hash_generation;
+	seqcount_spinlock_t	xfrm_policy_hash_generation;
 
 	spinlock_t xfrm_policy_lock;
 	struct mutex xfrm_cfg_mutex;
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ static struct xfrm_policy_afinfo const _
 						__read_mostly;
 
 static struct kmem_cache *xfrm_dst_cache __ro_after_init;
-static __read_mostly seqcount_mutex_t xfrm_policy_hash_generation;
 
 static struct rhashtable xfrm_policy_inexact_table;
 static const struct rhashtable_params xfrm_pol_inexact_params;
@@ -585,7 +584,7 @@ static void xfrm_bydst_resize(struct net
 		return;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
-	write_seqcount_begin(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
+	write_seqcount_begin(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
 
 	odst = rcu_dereference_protected(net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].table,
 				lockdep_is_held(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock));
@@ -596,7 +595,7 @@ static void xfrm_bydst_resize(struct net
 	rcu_assign_pointer(net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].table, ndst);
 	net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].hmask = nhashmask;
 
-	write_seqcount_end(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
+	write_seqcount_end(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
 
 	synchronize_rcu();
@@ -1235,7 +1234,7 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct wor
 	} while (read_seqretry(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lock, seq));
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
-	write_seqcount_begin(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
+	write_seqcount_begin(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
 
 	/* make sure that we can insert the indirect policies again before
 	 * we start with destructive action.
@@ -1344,7 +1343,7 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct wor
 
 out_unlock:
 	__xfrm_policy_inexact_flush(net);
-	write_seqcount_end(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
+	write_seqcount_end(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&hash_resize_mutex);
@@ -2085,9 +2084,9 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_l
 	rcu_read_lock();
  retry:
 	do {
-		sequence = read_seqcount_begin(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
+		sequence = read_seqcount_begin(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
 		chain = policy_hash_direct(net, daddr, saddr, family, dir);
-	} while (read_seqcount_retry(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence));
+	} while (read_seqcount_retry(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence));
 
 	ret = NULL;
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pol, chain, bydst) {
@@ -2118,7 +2117,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_l
 	}
 
 skip_inexact:
-	if (read_seqcount_retry(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence))
+	if (read_seqcount_retry(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence))
 		goto retry;
 
 	if (ret && !xfrm_pol_hold_rcu(ret))
@@ -4113,6 +4112,7 @@ static int __net_init xfrm_net_init(stru
 	/* Initialize the per-net locks here */
 	spin_lock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
+	seqcount_spinlock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation, &net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
 	mutex_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex);
 
 	rv = xfrm_statistics_init(net);
@@ -4157,7 +4157,6 @@ void __init xfrm_init(void)
 {
 	register_pernet_subsys(&xfrm_net_ops);
 	xfrm_dev_init();
-	seqcount_mutex_init(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation, &hash_resize_mutex);
 	xfrm_input_init();
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP