From 64bab7c3ac84a09a855d24df18b9363ab1f28d3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 18:10:22 +0000
Subject: drm/i915/selftests: Flush all active callbacks
Git-commit: 38813767c7c5d9f8e0bd6b14136add861cc79b33
Patch-mainline: v5.6-rc1
References: jsc#SLE-12680, jsc#SLE-12880, jsc#SLE-12882, jsc#SLE-12883, jsc#SLE-13496, jsc#SLE-15322

Flushing the outer i915_active is not enough, as we need the barrier to
be applied across all the active dma_fence callbacks. So we must
serialise with each outstanding fence.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112096
References: f79520bb3337 ("drm/i915/selftests: Synchronize checking active status with retirement")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101181022.25633-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <pjakobsson@suse.de>
---
 .../drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c   |  4 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h            |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c  | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c
index e864406bd2d9..f665a0e23c61 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c
@@ -53,9 +53,7 @@ static struct pulse *pulse_create(void)
 
 static void pulse_unlock_wait(struct pulse *p)
 {
-	mutex_lock(&p->active.mutex);
-	mutex_unlock(&p->active.mutex);
-	flush_work(&p->active.work);
+	i915_active_unlock_wait(&p->active);
 }
 
 static int __live_idle_pulse(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
index 44859356ce97..5dd62323b92a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
@@ -215,5 +215,6 @@ void i915_active_acquire_barrier(struct i915_active *ref);
 void i915_request_add_active_barriers(struct i915_request *rq);
 
 void i915_active_print(struct i915_active *ref, struct drm_printer *m);
+void i915_active_unlock_wait(struct i915_active *ref);
 
 #endif /* _I915_ACTIVE_H_ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c
index 260b0ee5d1e3..60290f78750d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c
@@ -250,3 +250,36 @@ void i915_active_print(struct i915_active *ref, struct drm_printer *m)
 		i915_active_release(ref);
 	}
 }
+
+static void spin_unlock_wait(spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	spin_lock_irq(lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(lock);
+}
+
+void i915_active_unlock_wait(struct i915_active *ref)
+{
+	if (i915_active_acquire_if_busy(ref)) {
+		struct active_node *it, *n;
+
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(it, n, &ref->tree, node) {
+			struct dma_fence *f;
+
+			/* Wait for all active callbacks */
+			f = rcu_dereference(it->base.fence);
+			if (f)
+				spin_unlock_wait(f->lock);
+		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+
+		i915_active_release(ref);
+	}
+
+	/* And wait for the retire callback */
+	spin_lock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
+
+	/* ... which may have been on a thread instead */
+	flush_work(&ref->work);
+}
-- 
2.28.0