From 8499428a45afd631f1f4485f5e582809e3a2834a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 16:04:27 +0000
Subject: drm/i915: Propagate errors on awaiting already signaled fences
Git-commit: 9e31c1fe45d555a948ff66f1f0e3fe1f83ca63f7
Patch-mainline: v5.6-rc1
References: jsc#SLE-12680, jsc#SLE-12880, jsc#SLE-12882, jsc#SLE-12883, jsc#SLE-13496, jsc#SLE-15322

If we see an already signaled fence that we want to await on, we skip
adding to the i915_sw_fence. However, we should pay attention to whether
there was an error on that fence and if so propagate it for our future
request.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191206160428.1503343-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <pjakobsson@suse.de>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 41d63b6d53fc..a6238c626a16 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -972,8 +972,10 @@ i915_request_await_dma_fence(struct i915_request *rq, struct dma_fence *fence)
 
 	do {
 		fence = *child++;
-		if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
+		if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags)) {
+			i915_sw_fence_set_error_once(&rq->submit, fence->error);
 			continue;
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * Requests on the same timeline are explicitly ordered, along
@@ -1080,8 +1082,10 @@ i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *rq,
 
 	do {
 		fence = *child++;
-		if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
+		if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags)) {
+			i915_sw_fence_set_error_once(&rq->submit, fence->error);
 			continue;
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * We don't squash repeated fence dependencies here as we
-- 
2.28.0