Blob Blame History Raw
From a655e6c6416636abd9b4506d2b3daeef9645fa36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 04:57:07 -0600
Subject: drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
Git-commit: 5b2adbddf25c3543b265c0b8834a4580b971f71e
Patch-mainline: v5.7-rc1
References: jsc#SLE-12680, jsc#SLE-12880, jsc#SLE-12882, jsc#SLE-12883, jsc#SLE-13496, jsc#SLE-15322
 member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200305105707.GA19261@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <pjakobsson@suse.de>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
index 26d1d5886352..139d25a8328e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct vc4_perfmon {
 	 * Note that counter values can't be reset, but you can fake a reset by
 	 * destroying the perfmon and creating a new one.
 	 */
-	u64 counters[0];
+	u64 counters[];
 };
 
 struct vc4_dev {
-- 
2.28.0