Blob Blame History Raw
From: "Nikita V. Shirokov" <tehnerd@tehnerd.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:57:47 -0800
Subject: bpf: Allow to change skb mark in test_run
Patch-mainline: v5.6-rc1
Git-commit: 6de6c1f840c051017f2308503858ff19344c56b3
References: bsc#1177028

allow to pass skb's mark field into bpf_prog_test_run ctx
for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS prog type. that would allow
to test bpf programs which are doing decision based on this
field

Signed-off-by: Nikita V. Shirokov <tehnerd@tehnerd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c                               |   10 +++++++++-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c |    5 +++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c |    1 +
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -247,7 +247,13 @@ static int convert___skb_to_skb(struct s
 		return 0;
 
 	/* make sure the fields we don't use are zeroed */
-	if (!range_is_zero(__skb, 0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, priority)))
+	if (!range_is_zero(__skb, 0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* mark is allowed */
+
+	if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, mark),
+			   offsetof(struct __sk_buff, priority)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* priority is allowed */
@@ -271,6 +277,7 @@ static int convert___skb_to_skb(struct s
 			   sizeof(struct __sk_buff)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	skb->mark = __skb->mark;
 	skb->priority = __skb->priority;
 	skb->tstamp = __skb->tstamp;
 	memcpy(&cb->data, __skb->cb, QDISC_CB_PRIV_LEN);
@@ -285,6 +292,7 @@ static void convert_skb_to___skb(struct
 	if (!__skb)
 		return;
 
+	__skb->mark = skb->mark;
 	__skb->priority = skb->priority;
 	__skb->tstamp = skb->tstamp;
 	memcpy(__skb->cb, &cb->data, QDISC_CB_PRIV_LEN);
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ void test_skb_ctx(void)
 		.tstamp = 7,
 		.wire_len = 100,
 		.gso_segs = 8,
+		.mark = 9,
 	};
 	struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr tattr = {
 		.data_in = &pkt_v4,
@@ -93,4 +94,8 @@ void test_skb_ctx(void)
 		   "ctx_out_tstamp",
 		   "skb->tstamp == %lld, expected %d\n",
 		   skb.tstamp, 8);
+	CHECK_ATTR(skb.mark != 10,
+		   "ctx_out_mark",
+		   "skb->mark == %u, expected %d\n",
+		   skb.mark, 10);
 }
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ int process(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	}
 	skb->priority++;
 	skb->tstamp++;
+	skb->mark++;
 
 	if (skb->wire_len != 100)
 		return 1;