From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:49:29 +0200
Subject: mlxsw: spectrum_router: Don't rely on missing extack to symbolize
 dump
Patch-mainline: v5.5-rc1
Git-commit: 3f9e5c119a47d0fce01f8524ff0aba3acca71bb9
References: bsc#1154488

Currently if info->extack is NULL, mlxsw assumes that the event came
down from dump. Originally, the dump did not propagate the return value
back to the original caller (fib_notifier_register()). However, that is
now happening. So benefit from this and push the error up if it happened.
Remove rule cases in work handlers that are now dead code.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c |   22 ------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
@@ -6002,12 +6002,6 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_event_w
 		mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_del(mlxsw_sp, &fib_work->fen_info);
 		fib_info_put(fib_work->fen_info.fi);
 		break;
-	case FIB_EVENT_RULE_ADD:
-		/* if we get here, a rule was added that we do not support.
-		 * just do the fib_abort
-		 */
-		mlxsw_sp_router_fib_abort(mlxsw_sp);
-		break;
 	case FIB_EVENT_NH_ADD: /* fall through */
 	case FIB_EVENT_NH_DEL:
 		mlxsw_sp_nexthop4_event(mlxsw_sp, fib_work->event,
@@ -6048,12 +6042,6 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_event_w
 					 fib_work->fib6_work.nrt6);
 		mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_work_fini(&fib_work->fib6_work);
 		break;
-	case FIB_EVENT_RULE_ADD:
-		/* if we get here, a rule was added that we do not support.
-		 * just do the fib_abort
-		 */
-		mlxsw_sp_router_fib_abort(mlxsw_sp);
-		break;
 	}
 	rtnl_unlock();
 	kfree(fib_work);
@@ -6095,12 +6083,6 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_fibmr_event_
 					      &fib_work->ven_info);
 		dev_put(fib_work->ven_info.dev);
 		break;
-	case FIB_EVENT_RULE_ADD:
-		/* if we get here, a rule was added that we do not support.
-		 * just do the fib_abort
-		 */
-		mlxsw_sp_router_fib_abort(mlxsw_sp);
-		break;
 	}
 	rtnl_unlock();
 	kfree(fib_work);
@@ -6245,9 +6227,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event(str
 	case FIB_EVENT_RULE_DEL:
 		err = mlxsw_sp_router_fib_rule_event(event, info,
 						     router->mlxsw_sp);
-		if (!err || info->extack)
-			return notifier_from_errno(err);
-		break;
+		return notifier_from_errno(err);
 	case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD:
 	case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_REPLACE: /* fall through */
 	case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_APPEND:  /* fall through */