From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 03:24:48 +0100
Subject: netfilter: nf_queue: do not release refcouts until nf_reinject is
 done
Patch-mainline: v5.7-rc1
Git-commit: af370ab36fcd19f04e3408c402608e7e56e6f188
References: bsc#1176447

nf_queue is problematic when another NF_QUEUE invocation happens
from nf_reinject().

1. nf_queue is invoked, increments state->sk refcount.
2. skb is queued, waiting for verdict.
3. sk is closed/released.
3. verdict comes back, nf_reinject is called.
4. nf_reinject drops the reference -- refcount can now drop to 0

Instead of get_ref/release_ref pattern, we need to nest the get_ref calls:
    get_ref
       get_ref
       release_ref
     release_ref

So that when we invoke the next processing stage (another netfilter
or the okfn()), we hold at least one reference count on the
devices/socket.

After previous patch, it is now safe to put the entry even after okfn()
has potentially free'd the skb.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_queue.c |    6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
@@ -303,12 +303,10 @@ void nf_reinject(struct nf_queue_entry *
 
 	hooks = nf_hook_entries_head(net, pf, entry->state.hook);
 
-	nf_queue_entry_release_refs(entry);
-
 	i = entry->hook_index;
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!hooks || i >= hooks->num_hook_entries)) {
 		kfree_skb(skb);
-		kfree(entry);
+		nf_queue_entry_free(entry);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -347,6 +345,6 @@ next_hook:
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 	}
 
-	kfree(entry);
+	nf_queue_entry_free(entry);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_reinject);