From f8c984e052d6a0187435bf356f2e4d1b30a0947b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xuewei Zhang <xueweiz@google.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 17:12:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Scale bandwidth quota and period without losing
quota/period ratio precision
References: git fixes (sched) bnc#1151927 5.3.9
Patch-mainline: v5.4-rc3
Git-commit: 4929a4e6faa0f13289a67cae98139e727f0d4a97
The quota/period ratio is used to ensure a child task group won't get
more bandwidth than the parent task group, and is calculated as:
normalized_cfs_quota() = [(quota_us << 20) / period_us]
If the quota/period ratio was changed during this scaling due to
precision loss, it will cause inconsistency between parent and child
task groups.
See below example:
A userspace container manager (kubelet) does three operations:
1) Create a parent cgroup, set quota to 1,000us and period to 10,000us.
2) Create a few children cgroups.
3) Set quota to 1,000us and period to 10,000us on a child cgroup.
These operations are expected to succeed. However, if the scaling of
147/128 happens before step 3, quota and period of the parent cgroup
will be changed:
new_quota: 1148437ns, 1148us
new_period: 11484375ns, 11484us
And when step 3 comes in, the ratio of the child cgroup will be
104857, which will be larger than the parent cgroup ratio (104821),
and will fail.
Scaling them by a factor of 2 will fix the problem.
Tested-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xuewei Zhang <xueweiz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Fixes: 2e8e19226398 ("sched/fair: Limit sched_cfs_period_timer() loop to avoid hard lockup")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191004001243.140897-1-xueweiz@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index ca932715e768..7e0b566ad73e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4995,20 +4995,28 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart sched_cfs_period_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
if (++count > 3) {
u64 new, old = ktime_to_ns(cfs_b->period);
- new = (old * 147) / 128; /* ~115% */
- new = min(new, max_cfs_quota_period);
-
- cfs_b->period = ns_to_ktime(new);
-
- /* since max is 1s, this is limited to 1e9^2, which fits in u64 */
- cfs_b->quota *= new;
- cfs_b->quota = div64_u64(cfs_b->quota, old);
-
- pr_warn_ratelimited(
- "cfs_period_timer[cpu%d]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us %lld, cfs_quota_us = %lld)\n",
- smp_processor_id(),
- div_u64(new, NSEC_PER_USEC),
- div_u64(cfs_b->quota, NSEC_PER_USEC));
+ /*
+ * Grow period by a factor of 2 to avoid losing precision.
+ * Precision loss in the quota/period ratio can cause __cfs_schedulable
+ * to fail.
+ */
+ new = old * 2;
+ if (new < max_cfs_quota_period) {
+ cfs_b->period = ns_to_ktime(new);
+ cfs_b->quota *= 2;
+
+ pr_warn_ratelimited(
+ "cfs_period_timer[cpu%d]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us = %lld, cfs_quota_us = %lld)\n",
+ smp_processor_id(),
+ div_u64(new, NSEC_PER_USEC),
+ div_u64(cfs_b->quota, NSEC_PER_USEC));
+ } else {
+ pr_warn_ratelimited(
+ "cfs_period_timer[cpu%d]: period too short, but cannot scale up without losing precision (cfs_period_us = %lld, cfs_quota_us = %lld)\n",
+ smp_processor_id(),
+ div_u64(old, NSEC_PER_USEC),
+ div_u64(cfs_b->quota, NSEC_PER_USEC));
+ }
/* reset count so we don't come right back in here */
count = 0;