From: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 14:39:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] erofs: relinquish volume with mutex held
References: bsc#1012628
Patch-mainline: 6.2.3
Git-commit: 7032809a44d752b9e2275833787e0aa88a7540af

[ Upstream commit 7032809a44d752b9e2275833787e0aa88a7540af ]

Relinquish fscache volume with mutex held.  Otherwise if a new domain is
registered when the old domain with the same name gets removed from the
list but not relinquished yet, fscache may complain the collision.

Fixes: 8b7adf1dff3d ("erofs: introduce fscache-based domain")
Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230209063913.46341-4-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 fs/erofs/fscache.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/erofs/fscache.c b/fs/erofs/fscache.c
index 014e2096..a7923d66 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/fscache.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/fscache.c
@@ -337,8 +337,8 @@ static void erofs_fscache_domain_put(struct erofs_domain *domain)
 			kern_unmount(erofs_pseudo_mnt);
 			erofs_pseudo_mnt = NULL;
 		}
-		mutex_unlock(&erofs_domain_list_lock);
 		fscache_relinquish_volume(domain->volume, NULL, false);
+		mutex_unlock(&erofs_domain_list_lock);
 		kfree(domain->domain_id);
 		kfree(domain);
 		return;
-- 
2.35.3