From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:28:57 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] net: tls: avoid hanging tasks on the tx_lock
References: bsc#1012628
Patch-mainline: 6.2.5
Git-commit: f3221361dc85d4de22586ce8441ec2c67b454f5d

commit f3221361dc85d4de22586ce8441ec2c67b454f5d upstream.

syzbot sent a hung task report and Eric explains that adversarial
receiver may keep RWIN at 0 for a long time, so we are not guaranteed
to make forward progress. Thread which took tx_lock and went to sleep
may not release tx_lock for hours. Use interruptible sleep where
possible and reschedule the work if it can't take the lock.

Testing: existing selftest passes

Reported-by: syzbot+9c0268252b8ef967c62e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 79ffe6087e91 ("net/tls: add a TX lock")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000e412e905f5b46201@google.com/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # wait 4 weeks
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301002857.2101894-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 net/tls/tls_sw.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index a83d2b42..38dcd9b4 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -941,7 +941,9 @@ int tls_sw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
 			       MSG_CMSG_COMPAT))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	mutex_lock(&tls_ctx->tx_lock);
+	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&tls_ctx->tx_lock);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 	lock_sock(sk);
 
 	if (unlikely(msg->msg_controllen)) {
@@ -1275,7 +1277,9 @@ int tls_sw_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page,
 		      MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST | MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	mutex_lock(&tls_ctx->tx_lock);
+	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&tls_ctx->tx_lock);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 	lock_sock(sk);
 	ret = tls_sw_do_sendpage(sk, page, offset, size, flags);
 	release_sock(sk);
@@ -2416,11 +2420,19 @@ static void tx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	if (!test_and_clear_bit(BIT_TX_SCHEDULED, &ctx->tx_bitmask))
 		return;
-	mutex_lock(&tls_ctx->tx_lock);
-	lock_sock(sk);
-	tls_tx_records(sk, -1);
-	release_sock(sk);
-	mutex_unlock(&tls_ctx->tx_lock);
+
+	if (mutex_trylock(&tls_ctx->tx_lock)) {
+		lock_sock(sk);
+		tls_tx_records(sk, -1);
+		release_sock(sk);
+		mutex_unlock(&tls_ctx->tx_lock);
+	} else if (!test_and_set_bit(BIT_TX_SCHEDULED, &ctx->tx_bitmask)) {
+		/* Someone is holding the tx_lock, they will likely run Tx
+		 * and cancel the work on their way out of the lock section.
+		 * Schedule a long delay just in case.
+		 */
+		schedule_delayed_work(&ctx->tx_work.work, msecs_to_jiffies(10));
+	}
 }
 
 static bool tls_is_tx_ready(struct tls_sw_context_tx *ctx)
-- 
2.35.3