From: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 22:52:12 +0800
Subject: RDMA/rxe: Rename rxe_atomic_reply to atomic_reply
Patch-mainline: v6.0-rc1
Git-commit: 548c56dd2e55005496160497b8f04595123bbd84
References: jsc#PED-1111
It's better to use the unified naming format.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705145212.12014-2-yangx.jy@fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static struct resp_res *rxe_prepare_res(
/* Guarantee atomicity of atomic operations at the machine level. */
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(atomic_ops_lock);
-static enum resp_states rxe_atomic_reply(struct rxe_qp *qp,
+static enum resp_states atomic_reply(struct rxe_qp *qp,
struct rxe_pkt_info *pkt)
{
u64 *vaddr;
@@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ int rxe_responder(void *arg)
state = read_reply(qp, pkt);
break;
case RESPST_ATOMIC_REPLY:
- state = rxe_atomic_reply(qp, pkt);
+ state = atomic_reply(qp, pkt);
break;
case RESPST_ACKNOWLEDGE:
state = acknowledge(qp, pkt);