From 0aa1125fa8bc5e5f98317156728fa4d0293561a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 21:02:12 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] locking/rwsem-spinlock: Add killable versions of __down_read()
Git-commit: 0aa1125fa8bc5e5f98317156728fa4d0293561a5
Patch-mainline: v4.14-rc1
References: bsc#1050549
Rename __down_read() in __down_read_common() and teach it
to abort waiting in case of pending signals and killable
state argument passed.
Note, that we shouldn't wake anybody up in EINTR path, as:
We check for signal_pending_state() after (!waiter.task)
test and under spinlock. So, current task wasn't able to
be woken up. It may be in two cases: a writer is owner
of the sem, or a writer is a first waiter of the sem.
If a writer is owner of the sem, no one else may work
with it in parallel. It will wake somebody, when it
call up_write() or downgrade_write().
If a writer is the first waiter, it will be woken up,
when the last active reader releases the sem, and
sem->count became 0.
Also note, that set_current_state() may be moved down
to schedule() (after !waiter.task check), as all
assignments in this type of semaphore (including wake_up),
occur under spinlock, so we can't miss anything.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: avagin@virtuozzo.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: gorcunov@virtuozzo.com
Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru
Cc: mattst88@gmail.com
Cc: rth@twiddle.net
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/149789533283.9059.9829416940494747182.stgit@localhost.localdomain
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
---
include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h | 1 +
kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h b/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h
index ae0528b834cd..e784761a4443 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct rw_semaphore {
#define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE 0x00000000
extern void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern int __must_check __down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
extern int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
extern void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
extern int __must_check __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
index 20819df98125..0848634c5512 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ __rwsem_wake_one_writer(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
/*
* get a read lock on the semaphore
*/
-void __sched __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+int __sched __down_read_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
{
struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -140,8 +140,6 @@ void __sched __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
goto out;
}
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-
/* set up my own style of waitqueue */
waiter.task = current;
waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ;
@@ -149,20 +147,41 @@ void __sched __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
- /* we don't need to touch the semaphore struct anymore */
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
/* wait to be given the lock */
for (;;) {
if (!waiter.task)
break;
+ if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
+ goto out_nolock;
+ set_current_state(state);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
schedule();
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
}
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
out:
- ;
+ return 0;
+
+out_nolock:
+ /*
+ * We didn't take the lock, so that there is a writer, which
+ * is owner or the first waiter of the sem. If it's a waiter,
+ * it will be woken by current owner. Not need to wake anybody.
+ */
+ list_del(&waiter.list);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
+ return -EINTR;
+}
+
+void __sched __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ __down_read_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+}
+
+int __sched __down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ return __down_read_common(sem, TASK_KILLABLE);
}
/*
--
2.12.0