From 99361bbf26337186f02561109c17a4c4b1a7536a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 11:41:41 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] bcache: properly set task state in bch_writeback_thread()
Git-commit: 99361bbf26337186f02561109c17a4c4b1a7536a
Patch-mainline: v4.16-rc1
References: bsc#1093023
Kernel thread routine bch_writeback_thread() has the following code block,
447 down_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
448~450 if (check conditions) {
451 up_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
452 set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
453
454 if (kthread_should_stop())
455 return 0;
456
457 schedule();
458 continue;
459 }
If condition check is true, its task state is set to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
and call schedule() to wait for others to wake up it.
There are 2 issues in current code,
1, Task state is set to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE after the condition checks, if
another process changes the condition and call wake_up_process(dc->
writeback_thread), then at line 452 task state is set back to
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, the writeback kernel thread will lose a chance to be
waken up.
2, At line 454 if kthread_should_stop() is true, writeback kernel thread
will return to kernel/kthread.c:kthread() with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and
call do_exit(). It is not good to enter do_exit() with task state
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, in following code path might_sleep() is called and a
warning message is reported by __might_sleep(): "WARNING: do not call
blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [xxxx]".
For the first issue, task state should be set before condition checks.
Ineed because dc->writeback_lock is required when modifying all the
conditions, calling set_current_state() inside code block where dc->
writeback_lock is hold is safe. But this is quite implicit, so I still move
set_current_state() before all the condition checks.
For the second issue, frankley speaking it does not hurt when kernel thread
exits with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state, but this warning message scares users,
makes them feel there might be something risky with bcache and hurt their
data. Setting task state to TASK_RUNNING before returning fixes this
problem.
In alloc.c:allocator_wait(), there is also a similar issue, and is also
fixed in this patch.
Changelog:
V3: merge two similar fixes into one patch
V2: fix the race issue in v1 patch.
V1: initial buggy fix.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Cc: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Cc: Junhui Tang <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c | 4 +++-
drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 7 +++++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
index 6cc6c0f9c3a9..458e1d38577d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
@@ -287,8 +287,10 @@ do { \
break; \
\
mutex_unlock(&(ca)->set->bucket_lock); \
- if (kthread_should_stop()) \
+ if (kthread_should_stop()) { \
+ set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); \
return 0; \
+ } \
\
schedule(); \
mutex_lock(&(ca)->set->bucket_lock); \
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
index 51306a19ab03..58218f7e77c3 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
@@ -564,18 +564,21 @@ static int bch_writeback_thread(void *arg)
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
down_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
if (!atomic_read(&dc->has_dirty) ||
(!test_bit(BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING, &dc->disk.flags) &&
!dc->writeback_running)) {
up_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- if (kthread_should_stop())
+ if (kthread_should_stop()) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
return 0;
+ }
schedule();
continue;
}
+ set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
searched_full_index = refill_dirty(dc);
--
2.16.3