From 771a081e44a9baa1991ef011cc453ef425591740 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:38:58 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Input: alps - fix a mismatch between a condition check and its comment
Git-commit: 771a081e44a9baa1991ef011cc453ef425591740
Patch-mainline: v5.3-rc1
References: bsc#1051510
In the function alps_is_cs19_trackpoint(), we check if the param[1] is
in the 0x20~0x2f range, but the code we wrote for this checking is not
Correct:
(param[1] & 0x20) does not mean param[1] is in the range of 0x20~0x2f,
it also means the param[1] is in the range of 0x30~0x3f, 0x60~0x6f...
Now fix it with a new condition checking ((param[1] & 0xf0) == 0x20).
Fixes: 7e4935ccc323 ("Input: alps - don't handle ALPS cs19 trackpoint-only device")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
---
drivers/input/mouse/alps.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c b/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c
index 62ffea00902a..34700eda0429 100644
--- a/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c
+++ b/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c
@@ -2876,7 +2876,7 @@ static bool alps_is_cs19_trackpoint(struct psmouse *psmouse)
* trackpoint-only devices have their variant_ids equal
* TP_VARIANT_ALPS and their firmware_ids are in 0x20~0x2f range.
*/
- return param[0] == TP_VARIANT_ALPS && (param[1] & 0x20);
+ return param[0] == TP_VARIANT_ALPS && ((param[1] & 0xf0) == 0x20);
}
static int alps_identify(struct psmouse *psmouse, struct alps_data *priv)
--
2.16.4