From e48e9c429a95e6ff103bb830f07e2e6a6954a839 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:45:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "ath10k: fix napi_poll budget overflow"
Git-commit: e48e9c429a95e6ff103bb830f07e2e6a6954a839
Patch-mainline: v4.14-rc8
References: FATE#326906
Thorsten reported on <fa6e3ee2-91b5-a54b-afe3-87f30aac7a48@leemhuis.info> that
commit c9353bf483d3 made ath10k unstable with QCA6174 on his Dell XPS13 (9360)
with an error message:
ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: failed to extract amsdu: -11
It only seemed to happen with certain APs, not all, but when it happened the
only way to get ath10k working was to switch the wifi off and on with a hotkey.
As this commit made things even worse (a warning vs breaking the whole
connection) let's revert the commit for now and while the issue is being fixed.
Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2017-October/010227.html
Reported-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c | 17 ++++++-----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
index 5beb6ee0f091..0aeeb233af78 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
@@ -1818,8 +1818,7 @@ static void ath10k_htt_rx_delba(struct ath10k *ar, struct htt_resp *resp)
}
static int ath10k_htt_rx_extract_amsdu(struct sk_buff_head *list,
- struct sk_buff_head *amsdu,
- int budget_left)
+ struct sk_buff_head *amsdu)
{
struct sk_buff *msdu;
struct htt_rx_desc *rxd;
@@ -1830,9 +1829,8 @@ static int ath10k_htt_rx_extract_amsdu(struct sk_buff_head *list,
if (WARN_ON(!skb_queue_empty(amsdu)))
return -EINVAL;
- while ((msdu = __skb_dequeue(list)) && budget_left) {
+ while ((msdu = __skb_dequeue(list))) {
__skb_queue_tail(amsdu, msdu);
- budget_left--;
rxd = (void *)msdu->data - sizeof(*rxd);
if (rxd->msdu_end.common.info0 &
@@ -1923,8 +1921,7 @@ static int ath10k_htt_rx_h_rx_offload(struct ath10k *ar,
return num_msdu;
}
-static int ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb,
- int budget_left)
+static int ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct ath10k_htt *htt = &ar->htt;
struct htt_resp *resp = (void *)skb->data;
@@ -1981,9 +1978,9 @@ static int ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (offload)
num_msdus = ath10k_htt_rx_h_rx_offload(ar, &list);
- while (!skb_queue_empty(&list) && budget_left) {
+ while (!skb_queue_empty(&list)) {
__skb_queue_head_init(&amsdu);
- ret = ath10k_htt_rx_extract_amsdu(&list, &amsdu, budget_left);
+ ret = ath10k_htt_rx_extract_amsdu(&list, &amsdu);
switch (ret) {
case 0:
/* Note: The in-order indication may report interleaved
@@ -1993,7 +1990,6 @@ static int ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb,
* should still give an idea about rx rate to the user.
*/
num_msdus += skb_queue_len(&amsdu);
- budget_left -= skb_queue_len(&amsdu);
ath10k_htt_rx_h_ppdu(ar, &amsdu, status, vdev_id);
ath10k_htt_rx_h_filter(ar, &amsdu, status);
ath10k_htt_rx_h_mpdu(ar, &amsdu, status, false);
@@ -2636,8 +2632,7 @@ int ath10k_htt_txrx_compl_task(struct ath10k *ar, int budget)
}
spin_lock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
- num_rx_msdus = ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(ar, skb,
- (budget - quota));
+ num_rx_msdus = ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(ar, skb);
spin_unlock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
if (num_rx_msdus < 0) {
resched_napi = true;
--
2.19.2