Blob Blame History Raw
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 10:53:39 +0800
Subject: Revert "net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one"
Patch-mainline: v4.20
Git-commit: 86a07da34380bc9467fa407dc3e484488a8ad40d
References: bsc#1109837

This reverts commit 78139c94dc8c96a478e67dab3bee84dc6eccb5fd. We don't
protect device IOTLB with vq mutex, which will lead e.g use after free
for device IOTLB entries. And since we've switched to use
mutex_trylock() in previous patch, it's safe to revert it without
having deadlock.

Fixes: commit 78139c94dc8c ("net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one")
Cc: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -296,11 +296,8 @@ static void vhost_vq_meta_reset(struct v
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i) {
-		mutex_lock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
+	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
 		__vhost_vq_meta_reset(d->vqs[i]);
-		mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
-	}
 }
 
 static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev,
@@ -904,6 +901,20 @@ static inline void __user *__vhost_get_u
 #define vhost_get_used(vq, x, ptr) \
 	vhost_get_user(vq, x, ptr, VHOST_ADDR_USED)
 
+static void vhost_dev_lock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
+{
+	int i = 0;
+	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
+		mutex_lock_nested(&d->vqs[i]->mutex, i);
+}
+
+static void vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
+{
+	int i = 0;
+	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
+		mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
+}
+
 static int vhost_new_umem_range(struct vhost_umem *umem,
 				u64 start, u64 size, u64 end,
 				u64 userspace_addr, int perm)
@@ -985,6 +996,7 @@ static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struc
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
+	vhost_dev_lock_vqs(dev);
 	switch (msg->type) {
 	case VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE:
 		if (!dev->iotlb) {
@@ -1018,6 +1030,7 @@ static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struc
 		break;
 	}
 
+	vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(dev);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
 
 	return ret;