Blob Blame History Raw
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 07:57:55 -0800
Subject: dccp: do not leak jiffies on the wire
Git-commit: 3d1e5039f5f87a8731202ceca08764ee7cb010d3
Patch-mainline: 5.4-rc7
References: networking-stable-19_11_05

For some reason I missed the case of DCCP passive
flows in my previous patch.

Fixes: a904a0693c18 ("inet: stop leaking jiffies on the wire")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Thiemo Nagel <tnagel@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 net/dccp/ipv4.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ struct sock *dccp_v4_request_recv_sock(c
 	RCU_INIT_POINTER(newinet->inet_opt, rcu_dereference(ireq->ireq_opt));
 	newinet->mc_index  = inet_iif(skb);
 	newinet->mc_ttl	   = ip_hdr(skb)->ttl;
-	newinet->inet_id   = jiffies;
+	newinet->inet_id   = prandom_u32();
 
 	if (dst == NULL && (dst = inet_csk_route_child_sock(sk, newsk, req)) == NULL)
 		goto put_and_exit;