From 5427f207852d5b905e251a5a728c8604d3594d58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 22:32:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Bump wait-times for the final CS interrupt before parking
Git-commit: 5427f207852d5b905e251a5a728c8604d3594d58
Patch-mainline: v4.16-rc1
References: FATE#322643 bsc#1055900

In the idle worker we drop the prolonged GT wakeref used to cover such
essentials as interrupt delivery. (When a CS interrupt arrives, we also
assert that the GT is awake.) However, it turns out that 10ms is not
long enough to be assured that the last CS interrupt has been delivered,
so bump that to 200ms, and move the entirety of that wait to before we
take the struct_mutex to avoid blocking. As this is now a potentially
long wait, restore the earlier behaviour of bailing out early when a new
request arrives.

V2: Break out the repeated check for new requests into its own little
helper to try and improve the self-commentary.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171023213237.26536-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3271,13 +3271,20 @@ i915_gem_retire_work_handler(struct work
 	}
 }
 
+static inline bool
+new_requests_since_last_retire(const struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+	return (READ_ONCE(i915->gt.active_requests) ||
+		work_pending(&i915->gt.idle_work.work));
+}
+
 static void
 i915_gem_idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
 		container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), gt.idle_work.work);
-	struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
 	bool rearm_hangcheck;
+	ktime_t end;
 
 	if (!READ_ONCE(dev_priv->gt.awake))
 		return;
@@ -3286,14 +3293,21 @@ i915_gem_idle_work_handler(struct work_s
 	 * Wait for last execlists context complete, but bail out in case a
 	 * new request is submitted.
 	 */
-	wait_for(intel_engines_are_idle(dev_priv), 10);
-	if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->gt.active_requests))
-		return;
+	end = ktime_add_ms(ktime_get(), 200);
+	do {
+		if (new_requests_since_last_retire(dev_priv))
+			return;
+
+		if (intel_engines_are_idle(dev_priv))
+			break;
+
+		usleep_range(100, 500);
+	} while (ktime_before(ktime_get(), end));
 
 	rearm_hangcheck =
 		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_work);
 
-	if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->struct_mutex)) {
+	if (!mutex_trylock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex)) {
 		/* Currently busy, come back later */
 		mod_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq,
 				 &dev_priv->gt.idle_work,
@@ -3305,13 +3319,14 @@ i915_gem_idle_work_handler(struct work_s
 	 * New request retired after this work handler started, extend active
 	 * period until next instance of the work.
 	 */
-	if (work_pending(work))
-		goto out_unlock;
-
-	if (dev_priv->gt.active_requests)
+	if (new_requests_since_last_retire(dev_priv))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
-	if (wait_for(intel_engines_are_idle(dev_priv), 10))
+	/*
+	 * We are committed now to parking the engines, make sure there
+	 * will be no more interrupts arriving later.
+	 */
+	if (!intel_engines_are_idle(dev_priv))
 		DRM_ERROR("Timeout waiting for engines to idle\n");
 
 	intel_engines_mark_idle(dev_priv);
@@ -3325,7 +3340,7 @@ i915_gem_idle_work_handler(struct work_s
 		gen6_rps_idle(dev_priv);
 	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
 out_unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
 
 out_rearm:
 	if (rearm_hangcheck) {